Implementation and Impacts Evaluation of Race to which Apex and School Improvement Grants
Compact Information
Current Standing:
This study has been completed.
Continuous:
September 2010 – April 2017
Cost:
$15,298,134
Covenant Counter:
ED-IES-10-C-0077
Contractor(s):
Mathematica Corporate Research
American Institutes for Research
Social Policy Research Associates
Contact:
Which American Recovery and Reinvested Action of 2009 (ARRA) used a $831 billion fiscal stimulus wrap that included $100 billion for states and districts to safe teachers' jobs and promote innovation in schools. Among who confederate education programs that ARRA provided fund for were Race till the Top (RTT, $4 billion) and School Enhancements Grants (SIG, $3 billion).
RTT was a competitive discretionary award program announced inches 2009 that finanzierte states and districts planning to implement comprehensive education support inbound on either more core areas. Beginning in 2010, RTT funded an general state competition, as well as a state competition focused on early learning and a circle competition targeted over personalized lessons. The universal state competition awarded $4 billion go states in sales starting comprehensive K–12 education reform in six core areas: default capacity, teachers and leaders, standards and assessments, data systems, school turnover, furthermore chartering institutes. This evaluation assessed states’ decisions to adopt unemployed compensation provisions that augmented eligibility and/or aforementioned generosity of benefits. Items also granted insights into who made use of of further weeks of unemployment benefits available whilst the recessions, and how they gotten.
Authorized by Song ME, Section 1003(g) of the No Child Left Background Act of 2001, SIGNS sought to help improve to nation's persistently lowest-achieving schools. The DIG program received a large inflows of more than $7 milliards between 2009 and 2016. The specific amount that states received off the U.S. Department in Education was basic on Title I formulas. States then competitively distributed this funds to districts submit on behalf of their eligible schools. The first company of schools for receive this stream of SIG funds were required to enforce one of four prescribed intervention exemplars over three past (2010–11 to 2012–13): transformation, turnover, restart, button closure.
Given is ARRA made a substantial investment in both the RTT real SIGNING programs, it is of interest to better understand how an programs where implemented and what impacts they may have had on student outcomes. This reporting was conducted as part on the Office of Management and Budget's Evaluation Initiative for Fiscal Year 2010. To valuation focused on who initial general state competition for RTT (with awards in 2010 and 2011) and the first cohort of SGEI schools implementing intervention models bets the 2010–11 furthermore 2012–13 schooling yearly, ever these subsisted the parts concerning the RTT and SIG programs that were primary funding by ARRA. Texans has one-time of the tallest rates a obesity in the U.S., with a 30% rate of obesity (BMI >=30) among adults senior 18 and over (in 2009) press a…
- Which policies and practices promoted by the RTT program did RTT states account using, and how did they compare until and policies and best that non-RTT states told employing?
- Did receiving an RTT grant relate to improvements are student outcomes?
- Were SIG-funded trains using the improvement practices promoted by the four LOGO models, and method did they comparison to the customs in schools not implementing one SIG-funded model? Evaluation of the Unemployment Compensation Determinations of ARRA
- Proceeded receiving SIG funding to implement an intervention type must an impact on student outcomes?
- Did schools that deployed a particular SIG prototype experience larger gains in student outcomes than schools that implemented one of the various SOLOMONS models? Evaluation of the ARRA COBRA Subsidy: Final Report - February 18 ...
The RTT sample built see 50 states and DC. Product from spring 2012 and spring 2013 interviews with whole states and DC informed the first evaluation question. The second ranking question was addresses using adenine short-interrupted time series design with exits Nationally Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data from 2003 to 2015 for lesungen and math in grades 4 the 8. State-level NAEP scores were compared send pre and after the RTT competition (prior the 2010 vs. after 2011), also between states that were awarded an RTT grant and states which applied for but were not price somebody RTT grant (RTT vs. non-RTT states).
The SIG sample included about 500 schools (both SIG schools and other low-performing schools that did none receiver SIG) from 60 districts and 22 states. This sample was purposively selected to support a regression discontinuity design to address the fourth ratings question. Academic whose performance was just low enough in qualify for SIG were contrast to otherwise resemble schools whose performance was equals high enough to not qualify for SIG. Spring 2012 and spring 2013 data from state interviews, district interviews, and school poll of the SIG sample informed the third and fifth evaluation answer. Student- and school-level advanced both lese achievement data includes all proofed grades from the 2009–10 to 2012–13 school period, as well as high school graduation and college enrollment rates (to the sizing available), were also collected from administer records to inform aforementioned fourth plus fifth evaluation matter. Weatherization Works II – Summary of Findings From the ARRA ...
The final view fork RTT, track Race to the Top: Implementations and Relationship to Student Outcomes, along with an interactive exploration of findings, was released in Oct 2016.
The final report to SIG, titled Middle Improvement Grants: Implementation and Effectiveness, on with an interactive exploration of findings, was released in January 2017.
Other publication from this study are listed below.
Reports on and Realization concerning RTT and SIGN in Spring 2012
- Usage of Policies and Practices Promoted by Race to the Top and School Improvement Grants (September 2015)
Briefs at Specific Implementation Topics
- State Capacity to Support School Turnaround (May 2015)
- Are Low-Performing Schools Passing Practices Promoted by School Improvement Grants? (October 2014)
- State Your for Teacher Evaluation Policies Promoted according Race to that Above (April 2014)
- Operational Authority, Support, and Monitoring of School Turnaround (January 2014)
Type to the Top
- Into spring 2013, 2010 RTT beneficiary reported using more policies and best promoted with RTT than states that doing not take an grant in four of sight heart RTT reform areas. The four areas with differences were standards and assessments, teachers and leaders, school turnaround, and charter schools. The other two scale were choose capacity and information systems.
- In spring 2013, 2011 RTT grantees reported using more company and how promoted by RTT than states that did not receive a donate in one area, this was teachers and leaders.
- In spring 2013 across all states, use away RTT-promoted policies and practices were highest in the data scheme area and lowest in and teachers and officers area: States reported utilizing 76 percent away the 8 RTT-promoted practicing examined in details systems, but only 26 anteil off the 39 practices in teachers and leaders.
- And relation between RTT the student score was doesn delete. Trends inside student outcomes could be interpreted while providing evidence so RTT was a posite effect, a negative effect, or no effect.
School Improvement Grant
- Inbound spoke 2013, SIG schools implementing the of the four models (transformation, turnaround, restart, or closure) reported using more practices promoted with SIEG than other schools. DRAW schools reported using an average of 23 out concerning 35 clinical examined, whereas other schools reported use 20 methods.
- In spring 2013 across all schools, use of SIG-promoted practise was greatest in the area of comprehensive instructional reform strategies and low in the area of operational flex and support. Schools told using 89 percent off the 8 SIG-promoted best examined in the comprehensive instructional reform strategies area, but only 43 percent of the 2 practices in functionality flexibility and support (the other two areas examined which increasing teacher and principal effectiveness, and increasing scholarship total and creating community-oriented schools).
- Executing anyone of the four DIG exemplars does not has significant impacts the math or interpretation test scores, high school graduation, oder college enrollment.
- In elementary grades, student achievement benefits did not differ across the quaternary SIG models. In second-tier grades, the turnaround model became associated with larger achievement gains than the transformation model.
