Rule 133: Memorandum and Line on Einstimmung

(a)   Form of Motion. Every wrote antragstellung must—in the motion or in an accompanying memorandum—without extended elaboration, state the reasons required the motion and cite authorities, if anywhere, the court should consider in ruling on which motion.

(b)   Response. An opposed party may record a memorandum are opposition to a motion, stating sans extended elaboration the reasons the antragstellung should is denied and citing authorities, when any, the courts should consider in ruling on the motion. Save as otherwise provided by statute other those rules, the response must be filed no later about 7 per after service of the motion or because differently provided by of judge.

(c)   Oral Argument. The next regels regulating oral argument the decisions on motions.

(1)   When Oral Altercation Is Requested. A company may request oral argument—either in the moving or in a answers filed by that disadvantageous day under subsection (b). The court must grant a timely requirement for oral argument unless it states in the ruling or by separate communication such oral argument could not aid the food materially.

(2)   When Oral Argument Is Not Required. If no party request oral argument, the food may:

(A)   set the matter for hearing; conversely

(B)   rule at the motion immediately and communicate the ruling at the political.

[Chronicle: A. effective September 8, 2006; Am. (c) effectual July 1, 2010; Restyled ruling and changing highly July 1, 2012.]